Are New Internet Laws Necessary Or Violations of Freedom?

by | Oct 7, 2015 | Lawyers and Attorneys

Latest Articles

Categories

Archives

The Internet has been a Wild West, anything goes kind of place for years, but it’s increasingly being brought under control. Opponents to regulations say that any rules are a limitation on their freedom. Governments and those who have been the victims of Internet crimes are all in favor of clamping down on what they consider chaos.

U.S. Approves Net Neutrality
In the U.S., the Federal Communications Commission voted, strictly along party lines, that broadband Internet service would now be regulated as a public utility. Tom Wheeler, the F.C.C. chairman, said that this move would protect “innovators and consumers,” preserving the traditional role of the Internet as a bastion of “free expression and democratic principles.”

Opponents, typified by Ajit Pai, one of the Republic commissioners, consider the new rules to be “government meddling.” They believe that Net Neutrality rules are likely to undermine innovation, reduce internet investment and ultimately would not benefit consumers. It’s too early to say which point of view will be validated.

China Passes a Sweeping Internet Law
Of course, China was already monitoring internet use by its citizens, but a new law extends their power much further, although details are vague. Officials claimed that a “severe national security situation” made it necessary to extend their control. Their new law covers their control over not only the Internet, but also over outer space, the ocean depths, and the polar regions. As is typical with Chinese law, it doesn’t spell out in detail what is intended, which leaves plenty of room for officials to later interpret it however they like, depending on circumstances.

South Africa Considering Severe Internet Censorship Law
Since the end of apartheid, South Africa was considered a protector of civil liberties and Constitutional law; however, drafts of a draconian new Internet Law with far-reaching censorship provisions have left many stunned. Some call it a return to censorship during apartheid, when the book Frankenstein was considered obscene, and the 1967 film Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was banned because it depicted a multiracial relationship. The current South African government apparently believes that it should censor and regulate all digital content.

Internet law is still in its infancy, but the attorneys at website are working hard every day to protect their clients’ rights. They handle cases concerning internet fraud, copyright infringement, and other Internet-related litigation. Not all attorneys are familiar with internet law, so contact Legal Philly today for a free legal consultation.

Connect with us with on Google+!

Similar Articles